Oxford Heartbeat and the EIC Accelerator: Stent Trial Unpublished

4 November 20261,892 words10 min

A flow diverter is a mesh stent a few millimetres wide that is pushed through the arteries into the brain to seal off an aneurysm, and once deployed it can end up a very different length from the one printed on its label. Oxford Heartbeat, a London company founded in 2015, sells software called PreSize Neurovascular that builds a 3D model of the patient's vessels from the pre-operative scan and lets the surgeon place virtual stents in it before choosing one. Its own website says a case can be rehearsed in about three minutes.

The EIC Accelerator selected the company's next project, PreSize Surgery, at its May 2026 cut-off for a grant only. CORDIS records an EU contribution of €2,499,031.52, an EC signature on 9 September 2026 and a project running from 1 October 2026 to 30 September 2028. The new project goes further than planning: it promises guidance during the operation itself. That ambition arrives before the company's main evidence for the existing product, a 103-patient prospective NHS trial that closed in July 2025, has been published.

€2.5MEIC Accelerator grant for PreSize Surgery, per CORDIS
95.6%Mean stent-length accuracy in a 138-case retrospective study
103Patients in the prospective trial, results not yet published

Company file

Legal entity
Oxford Heartbeat Ltd, Companies House 09685053, private limited company
Incorporated
14 July 2015
Registered office
167-169 Great Portland Street, London, since August 2026
Founder and CEO
Dr Katerina Spranger
Product
PreSize Neurovascular, planning software for flow diverter stenting of brain aneurysms
Regulatory
CE mark as a Class I measuring device under the Medical Device Directive, per the company; no FDA 510(k) clearance found
Latest accounts
Micro company accounts to 31 December 2024
EIC project
PreSize Surgery, agreement 101315187, October 2026 to September 2028

Sizing a stent before the operation

The planning problem is documented in the company's peer-reviewed papers. In a 2022 Journal of Neurosurgery study of 138 past Pipeline stent cases from five UK centres, the authors found deployed lengths that differed from the labelled length "in some cases by more than double", with no correlation between device size and how much it stretched. The software predicted the deployed length with a mean accuracy of 95.61%, or 96.13% after four outlier cases were excluded. One of the six authors works for Oxford Heartbeat.

The company's CE marking release of 16 March 2020 reported an earlier figure of 96.75% from 65 patients at four UK centres, against a 90% expectation it attributed to interventional neuroradiologists. Its company history page lists the CE mark under 2021 instead; the release is dated March 2020 and names the British Standards Institution as the notified body.

The published evidence

Three retrospective studies put the software near 95%

Mean accuracy of PreSize Neurovascular in predicting the length of a deployed flow diverter, compared with post-operative imaging. All three studies looked back at past cases, and Oxford Heartbeat employees co-authored two of them.

Patankar et al., J Neurosurg 2022; Rai et al., J NeuroInterv Surg 2024; Ngo et al., Interv Neuroradiol (online 2023). Values in percent.

Two further studies extend the picture. A Hamburg study of 98 Derivo devices, published online in October 2023 with three Oxford Heartbeat employees among its authors, found 94.54% accuracy, and the two neuroradiologists using the software chose stents about 4 mm shorter on average than those actually implanted. A 2024 comparison in the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, with no Oxford Heartbeat author, gave eight experienced specialists 51 past cases and found their estimates 81% accurate against 95% for the software.

Software against surgeons

Eight specialists averaged 81%, the software 95%

In the 2024 comparison, eight experienced neurointerventionalists estimated where a stent would land in 51 past cases, using their usual planning routine. The mean absolute error was 4 mm for the physicians and 1 mm for the software.

Rai et al., J NeuroInterv Surg 2024. Values in percent.

All three studies are retrospective: they test predictions against cases that had already happened. None shows whether using the software changes which stent a surgeon picks in a live case, or whether that changes outcomes. That was the job of the prospective trial.

The trial that has not reported

The ISRCTN registry entry describes a post-market, non-randomised study sponsored by Oxford Heartbeat and funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research. Surgeons planned each case twice, once their usual way and once with PreSize. The primary outcome is the accuracy of the simulated stent length in real practice; secondary outcomes include differences in the devices chosen, planning time, procedure time, radiation dose and intra-operative corrections. The registry records 103 patients enrolled between 4 August 2022 and 31 July 2024 at nine hospitals in England, Scotland and Wales, and an overall completion date of 31 July 2025.

The recruitment deadline was moved three times, from the end of 2022 to July 2024, and the intended publication date to 31 July 2025. The company announced on 9 July 2025 that the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy had endorsed the trial, that the Imperial Clinical Trials Unit was analysing the data independently, and that results were "anticipated to be published later this year". On 4 November 2026 the registry listed only a 2023 research summary as an output, and a PubMed search for "PreSize Neurovascular" returned the three retrospective studies above and no trial paper.

The prospective trial

Recruitment ran 19 months past the first deadline

The changes recorded on the trial's ISRCTN registry entry. The study is marked completed, and the registry lists no results output.

  1. Jan 2022Trial registeredPlanned recruitment end 31 December 2022, study end 30 June 2023
  2. Aug 2022First patient enrolledEnrolment starts on 4 August 2022
  3. Jun 2023First extensionRecruitment end moved to 31 December 2023, study end to 31 January 2024
  4. Jun 2024Second extensionRecruitment end moved to 30 June 2024, study end and intended publication to 31 July 2025
  5. Jul 2024Last patient enrolledFinal enrolment on 31 July 2024, after a third change in September 2024103 patients
  6. Jul 2025Study completedOverall end date and intended publication date
  7. Nov 2026No results listedThe registry lists only a 2023 research summary as an outputPending

ISRCTN17947655 registry record, editorial notes, checked 4 November 2026.

A finding quoted, a paper not found

In a Horizon Magazine profile of 30 June 2026, Spranger is quoted as saying a recent Oxford Heartbeat clinical study found that around one third of implants selected are not the optimal fit for the patient. The article does not name the study, and no publication with that figure was found in PubMed or in the trial registry.

Two figures in the company's own material also differ from the registry. Its trial announcements gave 100 patients in 2024 and 103 in 2025, and the registry records 103. Its homepage, checked on 4 November 2026, says ten UK hospitals take part in the trial; the registry lists nine.

What PreSize Surgery promises

The CORDIS objective moves from planning to the operating room. It describes combining the pre-operative 3D simulation with real-time intra-operative guidance "powered by generative AI", fusing patient imaging with live surgical data to detect deviations during stent deployment. The project's own figures: brain aneurysms in 5% of the population, a 50% fatality rate on rupture, stents costing about €10,000 each, a European economic burden above €4.7 billion a year, a target of "increasing surgical accuracy to 95%", and a market opportunity above €550 million a year. These are the applicant's numbers, not findings of the EIC.

The plan

Real-time guidance during brain stenting, built on generative AI, raising surgical accuracy to 95%, cutting complications and wasted stents, and opening a market above €550 million a year.

The record so far

A CE-marked planning tool with three retrospective accuracy studies near 95%; a completed 103-patient prospective trial without published results; no public evidence yet of the intra-operative product, a month into the grant.

  1. Accurate pre-operative stent simulationPublished94.5% to 95.6% in three retrospective studies, two co-authored by company staff.
  2. Clinical impact in live casesNot publishedTrial ISRCTN17947655 completed July 2025; no results output listed on 4 November 2026.
  3. Real-time intra-operative guidanceToo earlyProject started 1 October 2026; CORDIS shows no report yet.
  4. Fewer complications and wasted stentsClaimStated in the project objective; no outcome data in public.

A small company with public money behind it

The Companies House entry shows the company as active, with a confirmation statement dated 13 July 2026 and its next accounts due by 31 December 2026. The filing history records micro company accounts for the periods to 31 July 2021, 31 July 2023 and 31 December 2024, a format that does not publish turnover or a profit and loss account, so no revenue or staff figure is public. It also records share allotments in June 2024, January 2025 and January 2026, without the amounts raised being stated on the register summary.

No priced equity round has been announced by the company. Data aggregator CB Insights lists about $2.08 million raised across seven rounds, with backers including Creative Destruction Lab, Innovate UK and DigitalHealth.London. The company's history page credits several Innovate UK grants from 2016, a Royal Academy of Engineering fellowship in 2017 and the 2020 NHS AI in Health and Care Award, one of 42 winners from about 530 applicants, which funds the trial. Spranger told Sifted, as summarised by NeuronFeed in July 2026: "If public grant funding did not exist, Oxford Heartbeat would not exist in the same shape or form today." The same report gives more than 1,000 surgeries supported in 14 European countries, a figure that could not be checked against a second source.

The record

Eleven years from an Oxford PhD to an EIC grant

Milestones from the company's own history page, its press releases, the trial registry, the EU prize announcement and CORDIS.

  1. Jul 2015Company incorporatedFounded by Katerina Spranger after a biomedical engineering PhD at Oxford
  2. Mar 2020CE markClass I measuring device under the old Medical Device Directive, per the company's release
  3. 2020NHS AI awardNHSX and NIHR AI in Health and Care Award, which funds the prospective trial
  4. Aug 2022Trial startsFirst patient enrolled at a UK site
  5. Jul 2024Recruitment closes103 patients at nine UK hospitals103
  6. Jun 2026EU Prize for Women InnovatorsSpranger named winner at the EIC Summit in Brussels€100,000
  7. Sep 2026Grant signedEC signature of the PreSize Surgery grant agreement
  8. Oct 2026PreSize Surgery startsTwo-year EIC Accelerator project on intraoperative guidance€2.5M
  9. Sep 2028PreSize Surgery endsScheduled end of the EIC projectScheduled

Oxford Heartbeat; ISRCTN; European Innovation Council, 4 June 2026; CORDIS.

A UK company in an EU programme

The UK is an associated country of Horizon Europe, and Innovate UK Business Connect states that UK legal entities are eligible to receive its funding; CORDIS records Oxford Heartbeat as a self-declared SME at signature. CORDIS tags the project 100% to artificial intelligence and 40% to the digital agenda. The software has been studied at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and by Finnish clinicians, and in June 2026 the European Innovation Council named Spranger winner of the 2026 EU Prize for Women Innovators, worth €100,000, an award the Horizon Magazine profile ties to her work at the company.

The 2020 CE release said the company planned to move from the old directive to the EU Medical Device Regulation. Whether PreSize Neurovascular now holds an MDR certificate could not be verified in the public sources reviewed, and an openFDA search found no 510(k) clearance for the product in the United States.

The verdict

Accurate on past cases; the live-case evidence is overdue

Three peer-reviewed studies, one without company authors, put its stent-length predictions near 95%, against 81% for experienced specialists. The test that matters for hospitals is the prospective NHS trial, which closed in July 2025 with a stated publication target that has passed. The EIC grant now funds a more ambitious intra-operative product, and the article can only record that the evidence for the first product is not yet public.

Oxford Heartbeat has not been asked for comment for this article. The reporting is based on publicly available sources, listed below.

Industry

HealthMedical devices

AlsoHealthDigital health

Focus
  • Neurology devices
  • Clinical software
Technologies
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computational modelling
Keywords
  • Brain aneurysms
  • Flow diverters
  • Surgical planning
  • Interventional radiology
  • Neurovascular
  • Generative AI